The Institute is governed by a Board of Directors composed of representatives of various legal professionals. The Honourable Attorney General, the President of the Law Society of Singapore and the Deans of the Faculty of Law of the National University of Singapore, the Singapore Management University School of Law and the Faculty of Law of the University of Social Sciences of Singapore are ex officio members of the Board of Trustees. The other members of the Board of Directors are appointed by the President of the Singapore Law Academy. The Institute was established under the Legal Profession Act to coordinate, manage and monitor all initiatives, programmes and curricula related to legal education in Singapore, including diploma, bachelor`s and postgraduate programmes. It was commissioned on 3 May 2011. The Allen–Braddell Report was submitted to the University in February 1955 and made available to the public in April 1955. It was recommended that a faculty of law be established with the capacity to award degrees. It was suggested that a local law school would address the need for legal knowledge in Malaysia; that a local law course could be designed to prepare a person to become a lawyer and lawyer in Malaysia and, in fact, was better able to prepare a person for the merged profession. The report also highlighted another advantage of a local law school – the development of local law. A new chapter in the development of legal education in Singapore began with the Singapore Institute of Legal Education (“the Institute”), which was established in response to one of the recommendations of the 2007 report of the Singapore Legal Sector Development Committee.
The second was the local lawyers` committee`s insistence on English professional qualifications. However, public opinion was in favour of the provision of local legal training. The final agreement, which was reached between the University and the Federation and the Bars of Singapore, stipulated that all qualified persons – whether lawyers, lawyers or local LLB graduates – would have to pass a professional examination organised by the respective bar committees and, in addition, be apprenticed to a local lawyer for one year before they could be admitted to the bar. Legal education must keep pace with the current pace. With today`s globalization and increasing networking, attention to arguments about content equity is becoming increasingly important. Today`s lawyer must be sensitive to political considerations and have a solid foundation in the foundations of the law. It must be shaped into a thoughtful person with a passion for new learnings and holistic solutions. Differences in perspective and diversity of views on what should be taught and how law should be taught should be encouraged. Singapore`s legal education has come a long way, but the law school has no time to rest on its laurels. Its program must continue to be relevant.
The Institute is responsible for maintaining and improving the standards of legal education in Singapore and has the authority to review the implementation of initiatives, programmes and programmes related to Singaporean legal education, including diploma, bachelor`s and postgraduate programmes and continuing professional education. The Institute`s work includes conducting Singapore Bar Exams and Foreign Practitioner Examinations, as well as coordinating the mandatory Continuing Professional Development Program. In 1981, a major review of the program was carried out, which led to the Jayakumar-Chin report. He recommended compulsory non-legal subjects with the aim of providing students with a “broader education”. This was largely due to the desire to prepare graduates for the public service and the commercial sector. In the Sheridan years, there was a trend in the curriculum towards local law and the emphasis was on a liberal education in law. Topics such as “Malay Legal History” and “Overview of the History and Development of Civil Procedure to Date” were required of each student. Few students have been attracted to the law for a number of reasons. First, English was the medium of law and students in non-English-speaking colleges faced difficulties. In addition, there were cultural prejudices; the Western legal concept was foreign to Chinese middle school students. Third, uncertainty about the professional recognition of legal studies has kept the enthusiasm for distance legal education alive. The establishment of the University of Malaya Law Review in the 1958-1959 session, attributed to W.E.D.
Davies, was probably the most notable initiative for the development of scientific writing. The Law Review was renamed malaya Law Review in 1962 and Singapore Journal of Legal Studies in 1991. In the years that followed, local law flourished and the law school engaged with the world in various ways. An example of this is the establishment of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Environmental Law on 15 February 1996. The end of World War II and aspirations for independence led to the founding of the University of Malaysia. This was the result of the progressive strategy of the British. They would train locals to assume responsibility for administration and governance. As a result, the Carr Saunders Commission was formed to study the development of higher education in Malaysia and eventually recommended the establishment of the University of Malaysia. In addition to administering the CPD program, the Institute also organizes the postgraduate preparation course leading to Part B of the Singapore Exams and the Foreign Practitioner Exams. The profile is not currently claimed by the seller.
All information is provided by CB Insights. Lionel Astor Sheridan, 29, was entrusted with the creation of the law school.  He was appointed Professor of Law at the University of Malaysia on July 31, 1956, and one of his many responsibilities was to obtain professional recognition for the proposed LLB degree. No other cases of fraud were found, with the exception of 11 potential lawyers who cheated in the 2020 bar exams: Shanmugam Law and Interior Minister K Shamugam speak in parliament on May 9, 2022. SINGAPORE: Apart from the 11 potential lawyers who cheated at the 2020 bar exams, the Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) found no other cases of fraud, including in subsequent rounds of audits, Justice Minister K Shanmugam said on Monday (May 9th). In a speech to parliament, he said there was “a difference” between whether there was cheating on exams and what SILE found. But Shanmugam, who is also interior minister, reiterated that the institute had “found nothing else.” He noted that SILE said it had put in place additional safeguards to prevent fraud and introduced remote monitoring for online exams. Trainees who were found to have cheated will have to repeat their preparatory course and/or bar exams next year, and the court has adjourned their hearings to be admitted. Your requests for authorization will be negotiated after the adjournments have expired. “To be approved, they must convince all stakeholders involved that they are appropriate and appropriate to practice law before they are allowed to do so,” Shanmugam said.
The highest standards of justice The situation must be discussed carefully as the petitions of the grieving lawyers are still pending in court, Shanmugam said. He added that lawyers as trustees are expected to act in the best interests of their clients. At the same time, they owe the court “a very high duty.” “They must act with the highest standards of honesty to ensure that they can be counted on with the utmost confidence,” he said. He added that fraud is a “serious deviation from the basic principle of honesty” and that any dishonest behavior is “completely unacceptable.” “What will happen to the requests of individual trainee lawyers, how they are handled, will be decided by the courts, taking into account the point of view of the respective institutions, which will present their views,” the minister said. Related: CPD requirements are set out in the Rules of the Legal Profession (Continuing Professional Development) and the guidelines contained therein. CPD requirements can be met by: – writing an article and having it published in an approved publication; Participation in a conference, conference, seminar or workshop organized by an accredited institution, or in an internal seminar organized by a law firm for its own lawyers; Participation in a small group discussion organized by a group of lawyers or law firms; or the examination of a multimedia, internet, audiovisual, audio or video programme or material. Lectures in the new Kent Ridge Conference Room. Source: Kevin YL Tan Dato Sir Roland Braddell, who was instrumental in the establishment of the Singapore Law School.
Source: Photo courtesy of NUS, Faculty of Law Prior to the founding of the University of Malaysia in 1949, there were two colleges in Singapore: Raffles College and King Edward VII College of Medicine The headquarters of the Singapore Institute of Legal Education is located at 2 Havelock Road #04-18, Havelock II, Singapore.